JSON vs XML
JSON is more compact, maps directly onto the data structures of most languages, and has become the default for web APIs. XML is more verbose but carries features JSON lacks: attributes, namespaces, mature schema validation and XPath querying. Use JSON for APIs and configuration; use XML for documents, mixed content and systems that already depend on it.
XML to JSON Converter
Convert any XML document into readable JSON.
XML dominated interchange in the 2000s and JSON largely displaced it for APIs in the 2010s. That was not because XML is bad, but because most API payloads are simple records, and for simple records XML's document-oriented machinery is overhead you pay for and do not use.
Where the payload really is a document — with mixed content, attributes and a schema that has to be enforced — XML's extra machinery stops being overhead and starts being the reason to choose it.
Where JSON wins
A JSON object maps directly onto a dictionary or hash in essentially every modern language, so parsing produces something you can use immediately with no mapping layer.
- Far less verbose: no closing tags to repeat.
- Maps directly onto native language types.
- Native in browsers via JSON.parse, with no library needed.
- Simpler to read for straightforward record data.
Where XML wins
XML distinguishes attributes from elements, supports namespaces so vocabularies from different sources can coexist in one document, and has mature, widely implemented schema validation.
- Attributes, giving metadata a place separate from content.
- Namespaces, so two vocabularies can safely mix.
- XSD schema validation, far more mature than JSON Schema tooling.
- XPath and XSLT for querying and transforming documents.
- Mixed content: text and markup interleaved, as in real documents.
Security differences
XML parsers carry risks JSON parsers do not. External entity resolution can be abused to read local files or make outbound requests (XXE), and entity expansion can be used to exhaust memory — the "billion laughs" attack. Both are mitigated by disabling entity processing, which every parser should do by default on untrusted input.
Where each is still standard
XML remains the format for RSS and Atom feeds, sitemaps, SOAP services, SVG, the internals of Office documents and a great deal of enterprise and financial messaging. JSON is the default for REST and GraphQL APIs, configuration and logging. Neither is going away.
Example
The same record. XML separates the id attribute from the element content; JSON has only keys.
XML
<user id="42" active="true">
<name>Ada Lovelace</name>
<email>ada@example.com</email>
</user>
JSON
{
"id": 42,
"active": true,
"name": "Ada Lovelace",
"email": "ada@example.com"
}
Frequently asked questions
Is XML obsolete?
Which is more secure?
Does JSON have schema validation?
How are XML attributes converted to JSON?
Which is faster to parse?
Tools used in this guide
All tools →- XML to JSON Converter Convert any XML document into readable JSON. In your browser
- JSON to XML Converter Convert JSON objects and arrays into well-formed XML. In your browser
- XML Formatter Indent XML so nested documents become readable. In your browser
- XML Validator Check that an XML document is well-formed. In your browser
- JSON Formatter Beautify, validate and sort JSON with precise error messages. In your browser
Related guides
All guides →- JSON vs YAML Which to use for configuration and which for data interchange, and the YAML gotchas worth knowing.
- How to Convert XML to JSON Turn an XML document or feed into JSON, and handle the attributes and repeated elements that make it lossy.
- How to Format JSON Turn minified or broken JSON into something readable, and fix it when it will not parse.
Last reviewed .